Weeknotes 283 - more or less human through AI?
AI scrutiny and realfakism. New AI-assistants, and rumors on Apple exploring roaming homebots. And much more.
Hi, y’all! Happy IoT Day! This is a long tradition initiated by Rob van Kranenburg years ago. And still some events all around the world. Furthermore another week with AI and robotics dominating the tech news. Welcome to the new subscribers! This week's newsletter includes news on AI trust, things, and care for AI. Among others. And will Apple indeed introduce a roaming homebot? The paper for this week is related to the thoughts that were triggered by being human in an AI world.
Triggered Thoughts
In a talk by Karen X Cheng from a couple of months ago, she discussed her fight with herself being dependent on the algorithm. In social media mainly. She has 5 antidotes formulated. All very much makes sense, but let me focus on nr 4: Human + AI. One statement she makes at the end is that we are now (and with this presentation) thinking about strategies to protect ourselves from the algo-encapsulation. But is it our responsibility, she wonders? Are we now responsible for making our seatbelts in the car? It is an illustrative metaphor as it is relatable to people to think about the relationship between humans and AI through the lens of social media algorithms. It is a good example of how it potentially shapes our real-world behavior. And it can inspire us to overcome obstacles.
Combining with this video of Alice Cappelle on the role of technology in Dune, where she addresses how we work together with technology, using Weil and others to make the case in the way of a co-performance with technology rather than choosing the dichotomy of being ruled by tech or ruling tech. Tech and tools are cultures; how would they see archaeologists of the future look at our tools? The video is nice to watch if you are into tech philosophy/ers and concepts like Solarpunk and radical pragmatism.
In the same YouTube streak, I watched John Maeda's latest design report. He references, amongst others, a paper on Humanlike Artificial intelligence (see below). He wonders what our approach to AI and our relationship with AI should be. Should we design against AI? Do we want to prevent humanizing AI? He concludes by focusing on creating “palpable customer-centric criticality value.” Stay resilient to delusion and illusion, circling back in a way to Cheng…
For the new subscribers or first-time readers, welcome! A short general intro: I am Iskander Smit, educated as an industrial design engineer, and have worked in digital technology all my life, with a particular interest in digital-physical interactions and a focus on human-tech intelligence co-performance. I like to (critically) explore the near future in the context of cities of things. And organising ThingsCon.
Notions from the News
This week in AI
Last week, Perplexity was hinting at advertising models for the AI tooling. Google is now possibly considering introducing a paywall, which is kind of unexpected or at least a change of routine.
Are we indeed entering a time of AI gadgets? Or are gadgets the prelude to AI-enhanced things?
How will we relate to the new category of AI social apps that build relations with us and also start expecting attention?
A discourse on what open source AI stands for
Sometimes, a longer existing product gets attention by the introduction of new versions. Like the ring.
The physical AI is looking for new tech options
Some attention to AI safety. Research is lacking. Gary Marcus thinks it might endanger LLMs.
AI bias is a returning topic. Unplanned or planned bias.
Copyright issues are not surprising in the grey zone of AI citations… And then, who to trust if you get a claim?
Can AI make art? And what does that say about what art makes art?
You can imagine that a lip-sync challenge for AI-generated videos make sense for now…
Can AI scrutiny prevent deepfakes?
A risk for the development of AI is in the monetization according Tim O’Reilly “The push for rapid growth through capital accumulation risks creating monopolies and limiting market experimentation and diversity.”
AI enhanced browsers, and relates that to privacy browsing?
And in the round of new AI capabilities within tooling:
Robotics
Is Apple really working on their own humanoid or home robot?
More than humanoid. Sometimes robot news seems to focus on representations of humans or dogs only. Robots are much more generic, robotic things. Or does this count as an animaloid?
Tesla is announcing more on their plans for robotaxis. Meanwhile it introduced a new term for the Full Selfdrive Mode: Supervised. It dropped the beta label and is choosing a different strategy, not aiming for fully delegated (self-driving), but a team effort of the human and machine. It works rather well it seems.
Hyundai is entering your home with its robots. And has a car with a driving license.
Smart home
Bricked devices, even as it was announced some years ago, it stresses what defines product qualities nowadays.
Google’s Airtags
The categories start to merge more and more. Is an AI-enhanced home a smart home or an AI-assistant primarily?
And misc
A smartphone movie about your phone
Indicators of innovation
Paper for this Week
The Turing Trap: The Promise & Peril of Human-Like Artificial Intelligence
The benefits of human-like artificial intelligence (HLAI) include soaring productivity, increased leisure, and perhaps most profoundly a better understanding of our own minds. But not all types of AI are human-like-in fact, many of the most powerful systems are very different from humans-and an excessive focus on developing and deploying HLAI can lead us into a trap. As machines become better substitutes for human labor, workers lose economic and political bargaining power and become increasingly dependent on those who control the technology.
Erik Brynjolfsson; The Turing Trap: The Promise & Peril of Human-Like Artificial Intelligence. Daedalus 2022; 151 (2): 272–287. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01915
Have a great week!
I will be attending a session on Digital Rights, and on on the design approach for public challenges. I also hope to be able to visit STRP festival as I do every year. It is a bit shorter edition this year, but curious to check out the works. And don’t forget to check the IoT Day events. And oh, I might watch some of the best of Geeky Dingen; too bad this podcast had it's final episode.
Enjoy the week!
(In an earlier version that I also sent as email, I made a mistake with the edition nr (282)...)